Rather talk about me than to me?

I seem to recall that it was ultimately you who blew off the discussion with a parting note…something to do with not coming back? Which I suppose would mean that this comment of yours makes you a liar, for the record.

As it is, I also seem to recall that there were a few outstanding questions put to you which you were required to answer if in fact you wanted to continue commenting here. I will allow this one comment from you to illustrate the need for my restating that point…but until and unless you offer up the requested answers, you’re persona non grata here.

More proof that you lied about not having enough time to continue the discussion.

If that’s your standard of proof, it’s not hard to understand why you’re an atheist; you really would be one to believe in anything, then!

The fact that I was able to post a longer comment or article at a later point in time in no way proves that I had equally large amounts of time to invest at the (earlier) time I was talking to you, in the same way that a free afternoon on Saturday does not prove that I did not work at the office on Friday.

Still not admitting to being a coward?

Still not admitting to the possibility that a child can be indoctrinated to be an atheist? Still not answering direct questions posed to you?

It’s not me who has an issue with cowardice here, methinks.