Rss Feed
Facebook button
Technorati button
Reddit button
Myspace button
Linkedin button
Webonews button
Delicious button
Digg button
Stumbleupon button
Newsvine button

Hitchens is in for a rough go

Kenneth Hynek16th Sep 2009Religion, Atheism, Religion, Catholicism, The Sciences
, , , , , , , , ,

Cardinal — the Archbishop of is slated to debate at the ’s Festival of Dangerous Ideas.

As someone once said: this should be good.

In his address, titled “Without God We Are Nothing,” Cardinal Pell plans to speak about as a “minority sport and a temporary phenomenon” that only survives “by attacking or living off Christianity’s moral capital.”

The communiqué stated that the prelate will respond to the anti-theist address by drawing on his own and scholarship, as well as the example of scientific figures.

In a preliminary description of his presentation, Cardinal Pell stated, “Science by itself cannot provide an answer to the or options. To make such enquiries we need to engage in meta-physics.”

Pell is a strong speaker and a highly learned man — a force to be reckoned with, in addition to being a very orthodox Catholic shepherd. One can only imagine that he will mop the floor with Hitchens, who will no doubt be reduced to spewing invective and paedophilia jokes in place of offering actual debate (his usual drill when he comes up against a superior opponent).

And the point he makes above is key: whether one posits/accepts the existence of God or not, one cannot look to the empirical sciences to provide justification for one’s position, until and unless one can establish beyond reasonable doubt that things do not exist which are beyond the ability of empirical study to detect due to limitations in either the scope or means of such study. To put that more plainly, unless one can establish beyond doubt that empirical detectability is a necessary criteria of every extant thing, one cannot look to and empirical study alone in forming any opinion about God. Theist or atheist, one must leverage metaphysical principles to completely address that question.

The audience will hopefully be reasonable enough to follow that logic. I have little hope that Hitchens is possessed of the same capacity, however.

(hat tip)

Possibly Related Stuff:

No Comments Comments Feed

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

The comments are closed.